We are deeply concerned by recent government rhetoric that frames violence against women and girls (VAWG) as primarily a threat posed by migrants. This narrative is misleading, harmful, and diverts attention from the systemic realities of gender-based violence.
Evidence consistently shows that the majority of violence against women is perpetrated by men known to the victim, partners, family members, or acquaintances, not strangers or migrant communities. To suggest otherwise risks stigmatising entire groups, fuelling xenophobia, and leaving migrant women themselves more vulnerable to abuse and exclusion.
VAWG is a universal issue that cuts across race, class, and nationality. Effective strategies must centre survivors’ voices, strengthen community-based responses, and tackle the cultural norms that enable violence. Resources should be directed toward prevention, survivor support, and perpetrator accountability, not border control or divisive rhetoric.
We call on policymakers to reject scapegoating narratives and commit to evidence-based approaches that protect all women and girls, regardless of background. Only by addressing the root causes of violence can we build safer, more inclusive communities.
Why is Badenoch’s stance harmful?
Deflecting responsibility: It shifts focus away from the fact that most perpetrators are men known to victims, not migrants.
Fueling division: In a time where racism is becoming more overtly problematic, it can stigmatise migrant communities and make migrant women even more vulnerable.
Weakening strategy: It risks directing resources toward border control or surveillance instead of survivor support, prevention, and accountability.
#standuptoracism #EndGenderBasedViolence #stopthehate #EndFemicide